Version 1 · internal
The instruction and the older note
Instruction: current email limits preparation to the holiday issue.
Working note v1: still reflects an earlier school-week proposal.
Disclosure: September statement missing.
MIT working index
Build from the
right version.
The instruction changed. The working note didn’t. Replace the superseded entry and keep the remaining questions beside the revised index.
Harbour / Working index
Working note v2.
Earlier copy retained.
The holiday issue is current. The exact dates still need instructions.
The old copy is easy
to carry forward.
The substance has been discussed. Then someone opens an older working note while preparing the next copy. The changed instruction gets lost, and counsel has to explain it again.
The working index below identifies the current note, retains the superseded copy and lists the unanswered questions. The next reviewer can see what changed before opening each component.
The downloadable output is an internal index. It does not assemble or approve the Court package. Confirm the available production workflow during early access.
Judgment remains yours. You stay in control.
The Harbour matter
Replace the entry.
Keep the open questions.
Working note v2 reflects the current instruction. The holiday dates and missing statement remain on the list.
An earlier note is still in the index.
The revised note reflects the instruction.
Inspect the fictional replacement source
Working note v2 replaces the earlier school-week proposal with the current instruction to retain that arrangement and prepare the holiday issue. Exact holiday dates still need instructions.
Revision to prepare
Replace the entry; retain the history
Identify working note v2 as current for preparation. Keep v1 as superseded and leave the exact holiday dates and missing statement open.
Version 2 is ready for counsel’s review.
Version 2 · for review
Harbour / Working index
1. Latest client instruction: 15 October, retain school-week arrangement; holiday issue for review.
2. Working note v2: matches current instruction. Counsel review outstanding.
3. Working note v1: retained as superseded; do not use for current preparation.
4. PAS certificate: received; review scope must be recorded.
5. September bank statement: missing. August retained as earlier-period evidence.
Outstanding: exact holiday dates; review of affected draft sections; September source; procedural steps as applicable.
Nothing sent, filed, signed or scheduled by this website.
Fictional demonstration. Nothing is sent, filed or scheduled. Resets when you reload.
Before you use
the working index.
What does this example produce?
A downloadable plain-text working index with source identity, version or period, and unresolved work. It is a fictional website output, not an assembled filing or disclosure package.
Does replacing a source approve the work?
No. Receipt and revision are recorded separately from counsel’s review. Earlier records remain identifiable; unresolved questions remain attached to the output.
Can I use my firm’s forms and preferences?
Bring the required forms, naming conventions and preferred preparation steps to the early-access discussion. Confirm the supported format and output before relying on a workflow.
Prepare the next copy
from the current record.
Explore the preparation behind the index, or discuss your firm’s workflow.
Sources checked . Prepared by NISI Legal Systems Inc. for practitioner orientation. Check current Court directions for the matter. This page is not issued or endorsed by the Court.
Court FFP resources and formsRevised FFP Notice · 10 August 2026